Billy Davidson v. Tim Helder

              United States Court of Appeals
For the Eighth Circuit
___________________________

No. 20-1124
___________________________

Billy James Davidson

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

v.

Sheriff Tim Helder; Major Randall Denzer

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

Washington County, Quorum Court

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

Dr. Robert Karas

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
____________

Ap

              United States Court of Appeals
                         For the Eighth Circuit
                     ___________________________

                             No. 20-1124
                     ___________________________

                            Billy James Davidson

                    lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant

                                       v.

                Sheriff Tim Helder; Major Randall Denzer

                   lllllllllllllllllllllDefendants - Appellees

                    Washington County, Quorum Court

                          lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant

                              Dr. Robert Karas

                    lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee
                                   ____________

                  Appeal from United States District Court
             for the Western District of Arkansas - Fayetteville
                              ____________

                        Submitted: October 9, 2020
                         Filed: October 15, 2020
                              [Unpublished]
                             ____________

Before BENTON, WOLLMAN, and SHEPHERD, Circuit Judges.
                         ____________
PER CURIAM.

       In this 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, Billy James Davidson--formerly confined in
the Washington County Detention Center--appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant
of summary judgment. Viewing the record in a light most favorable to Davidson, and
drawing all reasonable inferences in his favor, see Cullor v. Baldwin, 

830 F.3d 830

,
836 (2016) (de novo review), we agree with the district court that defendants were
entitled to summary judgment. The judgment is affirmed. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
                       ______________________________




      1
       The Honorable P.K. Holmes III, United States District Judge for the Western
District of Arkansas.

                                        -2-

Add comment

Most popular